Common Law in Action

If we the people do not defend our rights, nobody else will.
Watch below how to not give a magistrate jurisdiction over you.




And another guy who knows his rights and vehemently defends them.

Global Assault on We the People #2

The two videos in Part 1 exposed the fact that we the people are being attacked by various means on a global scale. It is no longer a conspiracy story, even though many still think so, having been influenced by lies spread by Mainstream Media for decades. It is too well documented now in the public domain to keep on ignoring it.

With the help of whistle blowers and Alternative Media the ugly truth has been revealed and now people who have realized what is happening, start looking for ways to stop Agenda 21 from being fully implemented. But can we? Well, it may be a little late, as I just read somebody saying Agenda 21 was to be fully implemented by July 2014. If true, that is in less than a month.
Do we really still have a chance to stop this?  
Well, giving up before we've tried everything sure leads to defeat.

Here's what defeat looks like:
Every aspect of our lives will be controlled and regulated:
how we eat, what we eat, where we eat, where we live, how we live, how we move around, what we can and cannot buy, what we can and cannot say and yes, even what we think will be controlled and steered.
If that is your ideal in life, well then stop reading this right now.

This is what we're up against:
A minority of super rich psychopathic moguls (1% of the world's population) working only for their own benefit and profit.
When we look at the numbers, this tug-of-war CAN BE WON by we the people, even at this late stage.
How? - In a united effort.

But now you may say what can we the people in Africa, India, South America or wherever do about those money moguls who sit in the USA and Europe?
Aha, now you start thinking.
Who implements the rules of those 1% in your country?
Who is put in charge to implement Agenda 21 in your country?
Your government, of course; those whom you elected to serve you; those who now steal themselves rich on state resources and live in luxury while the people suffer; those who claim VIP status for life, meaning immunity from being brought before court for their stealing and in many cases their murdering.

United effort = all pulling on one and the same rope
The rope we have to pull on is our commonly inherited sovereignty.
Nobody has the right to attack our inherited human rights, no government and no law made by people in a government.
This rope is called COMMON LAW, which is enforced by Common Law Courts.
The people in the USA and Europe are a step ahead of other countries, as normal, but that may also be due to the fact that Agenda 21 originated there.
So they have started fighting those power brokers by various means. 
This is obvious to see in ITCCS, National Liberty Alliance(strictly USA), Neil Keenan Group, Round-op Alpha and others.
 
Even though all of them are fighting the same enemy, pulling on the rope of Common Law, they haven't yet combined their resources and tools, haven't yet united into one strong force as it were. This fact puts a strain on the tug-of-war and drags it out, giving the enemy a chance to counteract.

Since they are offering the basic tools they use to everyone who wants to join the fight, we in the rest of the world can only benefit from that. We are free to use the tools that best serve our immediate purpose to cut off the bottom handlers of the enemy. 

Time is of Essence
When we, the people in other countries, start cutting off the bottom handlers of the cabal, we isolate the top moguls in their respective countries, for those groups to handle. This way we may have a chance to get rid of all of them as soon as possible.
 
Here is an interesting interview which also mentions Agenda 21 at the 35.55 mark:

#3 Common Law – applicable in Namibia?

The question is: can common law courts be installed in Namibia?

We have a Constitution hailed as the most progressive in the world. This Constitution solidly enshrines our naturally inherited human rights. Thus one would think that common law, which is rooted in Natural Law, would have been given its rightful place within that Constitution.  This, however, is not the case. Instead, Roman/Civil Law has been cleverly weaved into the Constitution by those in control of the whole process.

We are not given a jury of the people, like in England, Canada and America, but judges appointed by the President. Can we then truthfully boast about having the most progressive Constitution in the world? I do not think so. But I digress.

Common law is an inalienable part of any democracy

Namibia claims to be a democratic Republic. In a Democracy, civil servants are elected by the people as their representatives and are thus accountable to the people, the community who elected them. It is then the duty of the people to enforce this accountability, not the duty of those elected.

When democratically elected governments do not address matters of concern to the community, they neglect their duty of office and must expect investigations concerning this neglect.

Such investigations can only be done by the people in whose service the government is placed. Public officials themselves do not have the jurisdiction to investigate their own wrong actions just as state-appointed judges have no jurisdictional competence to rule on the criminality and guilt of their employers.

That jurisdiction rests on the voting public. That is common sense – common law.

Common law is enacted by common law courts

Namibias’ courts are run as civil law courts, where the public at best is granted spectator status. Those courts do not serve the public. They are designed for the protection of rulers and tyrants.

The authority to establish jury-run common law courts is vested in the inherent sovereignty of the people and their resolve to uphold that sovereignty. Thus common law courts can be established in any community anywhere in the world.

The purpose of common law courts is the protection of the community and every part in it, including the protection of the inalienable rights of every person within that community.

Since that also is the purpose of the Namibian Constitution, the establishment of jury-run common law courts in Namibia is constitutional and lawful, even if not specifically mentioned therein. 
If we the people have the right to set up political parties opposing the government (Article 17+18), we most certainly have the right to set up common law courts.

The foremost principles of jury-run common law courts are due process and the normal Rules of Evidence. These principles, once again, are stipulated clearly in the Namibian Constitution. Thus jury-run common law courts would not violate, but uphold the constitution.

The go-ahead to establish such courts only depends on the needs of the community and their resolve to protect their inalienable rights and sovereignty.  It is not subject to any political system, government or any other legal or moral authority.  

If the Namibian communities decide they’ve had enough of manipulation and stealing of public monies and assets, they have the right and duty to start investigations to protect what is rightfully theirs.

For a more detailed explanation of jury-run common law courts you can go HERE .

#2 Common Law – what exactly is that?

In previous posts of this blog I have given broad outlines of different kinds of Law in practice today. One of those is Common Law. The Thesaurus gives “widespread”, “general” and “universal” as synonyms for Common. As the second part of its name implies, it has to do with rules and regulations.

There are but two rules/commandments given to Humanity, which most of us are familiar with and therefore can rightly be called “Universal Laws”. Those two concern Love, love and respect for our Creator and love and respect for what He created. Love does no harm to anyone or anything that was created.

Then there are rules and regulations which communities of people have adopted by unanimous decision in order to maintain peace amongst each other and regulate their day to day affairs. The Mosaic Law for instance was commonly known amongst the Israelites, it was their Common Law. 

Authority vs Tyranny

Common Law, then, is rooted in the Natural Law of love and care for each other. It is expressed by the people, for the people. It is activated by the people when they realize the need for a law. Its purpose is the protection of the inherent freedom and autonomy of all the people within a community.  It operates on the simple principle of what is best for the community and every part in it.  

Any legal decision that only serves a certain part of the community is not rooted in Common Law, not rooted in love.  Roman/Civil Law only serves parts of the community and is therefore diametrically opposed to Common Law.

Jury vs Judge

Under Common Law the inherent capacity of a sovereign people to objectively judge right from wrong is represented by a Jury of at least 12 independent people, who only serve on a temporary basis, judging or deciding on a specific case or issue. Their unanimous decision is respected and accepted as final. 

Under Roman/Civil Law the decision of one judge can be repealed by another one, depending on the arguments presented by people trained to look for loopholes in the confusion of statutes. Thus lies become truth and truth is no longer truth.

Court of the people vs Court of Rulers

Though Common Law is used everywhere in everyday life, certain matters and situations need to be dealt with more formally, before a tribunal of people in a specific place called a court.

Common Law Courts are courts of the people, where people are tried by their neighbors, who act as Jury, everyone being equal, having the same rights, freedoms and sovereignty. In order to prevent chaos at such a hearing, certain proven rules are followed, just as in the courts of the rulers.

The big difference is that instead of one state appointed judge, juries of 12 normal, untrained people act in that capacity on a temporary basis for the time of trial.  This is a better guarantee for a fair trial, as the Rules of evidence and just procedure have to be followed strictly in order for the Jury to arrive at just decision.

In the courts of the rulers judges regularly ignore rules of evidence and just procedure and are allowed to do so by their statutes. They are even allowed to silence a party in a dispute. Being appointed by the state in a permanent capacity, they can easily be politically manipulated and bribed.

Summary

A truly sovereign and free community can only stay sovereign and free when the people within the community take charge of their own affairs on every level.

As John Hancock, a founding father of the American Republic, declared in 1777:  

“If we have not Courts that are established and maintained by the People, rather than by bribable Judges, then we will have no Republic … Our Constitution and our Nation will rise or fall according to the independence of our Courts.”

In the next part of this series on Common Law I’ll discuss its applicability in Namibia.  

Common Law Part 1 – is it still used?

In two of my previous posts I have given short overviews of the different kinds of Laws that exist, namely Admiralty, Roman/Civil and Common Law. Why it’s important that we know about them I pointed out here. I will now proceed with Common Law, the Law of the People, which I think will come into more general use in a free society.

Is Common Law still used today?

In 2013 a shot was heard around the world when Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger, resigned. What may not be generally known is the fact that the International CommonLaw Court of Justice (ICLCJ) had prosecuted and convicted him and many other high profile people for crimes against Humanity. Whether the popes resignation was due to that indictment or not is debatable.

Fact is that people in many countries now start to realize that Admiralty and Roman/Civil Law have been used throughout the ages by the elite to keep We the people in submission to them. We have been taught and brainwashed to believe that we are unable to rule ourselves, that taking the law into our own hands is illegal and punishable, that we have to be controlled in everything by those “in the know”.

This movement toward Common Law can also be followed here. Seeing all this then tells us that Common Law is the way to go in the new era dawning on us. Therefore we have to find out exactly what this is all about in order to grab back our freedom and sovereignty, which the money elite have stolen from us.

As long as we stick our heads in the quicksand of their statutory teachings and don’t dare to investigate the avenues available to us to free ourselves from tyranny, we willingly give them the power to crush us, steal from us and exterminate us, which has been their plan all along. 

In 1649 already Gerrard Winstanley summed this up thus: “For what you call the Law is but a club of the rich over the lowest of men, sanctifying the conquest of the earth by a few and making their theft the way of things. But over and above these pitiful statutes of yours that enclose the common land and reduce us to poverty to make you fat stands the Law of Creation, which renders judgement on rich and poor alike, making them one. For freedom is the man who will thus turn the world upside down, therefore no wonder he has enemies.”

I am for freedom, what about you?

Common Law vs Civil Law

Why do I keep blogging about LAW?
Because most people do not know that there are different kinds of law systems by which we the people are kept in bondage and servitude to the rulers of this world. We cannot be a free people as long as we are kept in bondage by all sorts of laws imposed on us to curb our freedom. 

Does that mean that I promote lawlessness? NO, not at all. I promote justice and freedom for all. But in order to attain this, we need to understand how to address the legal processes that we come up against every day, which make us servants of a prison system. 

The very short but enlightening Audio below highlights this point.

Our Constitution not only guarantees us our freedom, but also subjects all public servants and institutions to it. We as individuals are responsible for holding public servants, officials and corporations accountable. We can only do this if we know the loopholes they use to evade their duty. We can only do that once we realize that we have the power, the right, the duty and the process to do so effectively.

If we really want to be a free people in a free country, it's our DUTY to hold our public servants accountable and not let them undermine our Constitution. They aren't called public servants for nothing. As servants, they have masters. Who are their masters? We the people, the public. Masters are supposed to lead, be leaders. If they don't lead and guide their servants, the servants will take advantage of the situation and take over the household, do as they please. 

This is exactly what is happening in Namibia today. We the people, the masters, do not realize that we indeed are the masters and so our servants are busy taking over the household, the country, selling it for their own profit. That is what servants do when given the chance, they steal.

Since Knowledge is Power, we have to first gain knowledge, then spread this knowledge amongst we the people. This can be done in different ways. The youth can use the internet to gain knowledge and spread what they've gained amongst those who haven't got internet access, so all of we the people can be empowered and assume our role as masters. 

You can start this people empowering action right here by using the promote buttons below. The quicker we can empower all of the people, the sooner we can call our "government" servants to order.  

Centuries ago Thomas Jefferson already said:

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." Thomas Jefferson

---

"An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens." Thomas Jefferson

Posts related to this one can be found here and here.

Admiralty, Common + Civil Law - a short overview

The Namibian Constitution mentions common law as well as the law of the land. In the audio about enforcing your right in court Admiralty Law is mentioned. Most of us haven't got the faintest clue what this is all about, but if we start claiming our rights in court and defend ourselves, we need to know the differences. 

So I went searching until I found some easy explanations. I hope these will help you too. 
From this site I got:

" Common law is generally uncodified. This means that there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar cases. These precedents are maintained over time through the records of the courts as well as historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports. The precedents to be applied in the decision of each new case are determined by the presiding judge. As a result, judges have an enormous role in shaping American and British law. Common law functions as an adversarial system, a contest between two opposing parties before a judge who moderates. A jury of ordinary people without legal training decides on the facts of the case. The judge then determines the appropriate sentence based on the jury’s verdict.

Civil Law, in contrast, is codified. Countries with civil law systems have comprehensive, continuously updated legal codes that specify all matters capable of being brought before a court, the applicable procedure, and the appropriate punishment for each offense. Such codes distinguish between different categories of law: substantive law establishes which acts are subject to criminal or civil prosecution, procedural law establishes how to determine whether a particular action constitutes a criminal act, and penal law establishes the appropriate penalty. In a civil law system, the judge’s role is to establish the facts of the case and to apply the provisions of the applicable code. Though the judge often brings the formal charges, investigates the matter, and decides on the case, he or she works within a framework established by a comprehensive, codified set of laws. The judge’s decision is consequently less crucial in shaping civil law than the decisions of legislators and legal scholars who draft and interpret the codes."   Read more

On Admiralty Law I found the video below: